Will money make Nancy Pelosi shut up?

Posted on | March 27, 2008 | 2 Comments

I guess if you can’t win an election at the polls, you can always buy one, huh?

According to the Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks money and politics:

WAS DEMOCRATIC DONORS’ LETTER TO PELOSI A RANSOM NOTE?

Prominent backers of Hillary Clinton sent a multi-million-dollar message to Capitol Hill this week: Watch out, Nancy Pelosi. In a letter to the Speaker of the House that urged her to stay out of the debate over how superdelegates should cast their votes, the 20 major Democratic donors didn’t call direct attention to the fortune they’ve given to the Democratic Party, but they did remind her of their “enthusiastic” support over the years. The Center for Responsive Politics has found that the letter-signers, along with their spouses, have contributed $23.6 million to Democrats since 1999, including $554,000 to Clinton’s campaigns and PAC — 10 times what they’ve contributed to Barack Obama. Nearly $3 million has gone to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the party fundraiser for the Democratic members Pelosi leads in the House.

If you want to find out more about this veiled threat, you can read more here.

It’s interesting to watch this drama because it really is beginning to look like the pundits may be right about the Clinton camp’s determination to win at any costs and, if they can’t, to make sure nobody else can either. That’s a rather amazing level of megalomania but, I suppose, you don’t get far in politics by being studiously and sincerely humble.

It’s great political theater, of course, but I’m just wondering if Howard Dean has any hair left at this point.

[tags]politics, 2008 presidential campaign, Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Democratic primary[/tags]


Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post

Bookmark and Share


Comments

2 Responses to “Will money make Nancy Pelosi shut up?”

  1. Don Imus
    March 28th, 2008 @ 8:23 am

    Democrats wanted the Super Delegates but they should of done away with them. Since they are in effect they should be able to vote any way they want accorrding to party rules.

    Caucus are a stupid Democrat thing also. If they did not exist such as the Republican winner takes all delegates. Hillary would of already won by a landslide.

    Obama is Buying the Super Delegates. This election is the sadest election in American history if Obama wins with poor peoples donated church money

  2. The Journal Blogger
    March 28th, 2008 @ 8:57 am

    Well, without taking any pot shots at how either party has chosen to execute the delegate selection process, I need to make a correction to what you said.

    In the actual popular vote, Hillary is currently down by about 700,000 votes. If, in spite of that, she were to win the nomination (in, say, a winner takes all scenario), a lot of folks would view that as highly unfair and … um … un-Democrat-like.

    Your final paragraph is such arrant nonsense that it’s hard to comment on it, so I won’t.

Subscribe To The Journal Blog

Subscribe to The Journal Blog via RSS

Or subscribe by email:



Meet The Journal Blogger

Dawn Rivers Baker, microbusiness journalistDawn Rivers Baker, aka The Journal Blogger, is the editor and publisher of The MicroEnterprise Journal, and the self-proclaimed Socrates of the small business blogosphere. See her official bio to learn more.


Find Dawn elsewhere online:


Listen to Dawn Rivers Baker on Blog Talk Radio

featured on US News & World Report


Small Business Trends Expert

Contributor, OPEN Forum Blog

Connect with Dawn


View Dawn Rivers Baker's profile on LinkedIn


Facebook me!

Follow me on twitter

  • Daily Reads: Blogs

  • Daily Reads: News

  • Visit Our Sponsors

    Archives

    Categories

    Search